10 December 2007 @ 01:52 am
“I don’t know, probably nothing from Staples, I guess …”  

I almost began this entry by saying, “What Would Jesus Buy follows a troop of charmingly savvy anarchist consumerism protesters masquerading as a traveling minister and his choir.” But that would be somewhat unfair. The Church of Stop Shopping isn’t masquerading as anything; it’s exactly what it says it is, and the medium is part of the message in a way that’s completely insane — yet oddly appropriate.

The long and short of it is this: One day Bill noticed that people buy too much useless shit, only to discard it promptly and then go out and buy more useless shit. This is bad. It wastes money and resources, and gives rise to giant warehouse chains like Wal-Mart while simultaneously driving down livable wages and rewarding corporate tendencies to prey on less industrialized nations. Therefore, like bored, stoned-on-advertising, mindless shopping zombies, consumers simultaneously bleed themselves dry through credit card debt and foster poverty at home and abroad.

Okay, maybe that’s the long of it. The short of it is this: Reverend Billy wants you to stop shopping. Specifically, he and his troop of be-robed back-up singers are coming at you with a Christmas message straight from heaven. Your religious holiday has been turned into a secular spectacle. It’s up to you to take it back.

If parody is made for mockery and satire strives for change, then the CoSS is somewhere on the far side of satire. It’s honest guerrilla activism — and I want to say that it frames its argument in spiritual guise, but again, that’s not quite right. Their message is a spiritual one: stay home, keep your money, and give your loved ones some love. Most of the CoSS meetings are held in churches, there’s no sarcastic denigration of Christianity or any other religion, and although the message is non-denominational, there’s more than merely the trappings of rogue televangelism at work.

In one of the documentary’s more poignant moments, the Rev, standing before his choir at the front of a church (where most of their meetings are held), reminds the congregation that Christmas is supposed to be about the birth of a baby who will grow up and teach us about peace. It’s not about stuffing the tree’s underskirt until you’ve driven the family into bankruptcy.

The sincerity surprised me even more than the ambient madness. “Reverend Billy” as a construct might be a mask contrived to make a statement, but the mask isn’t the one getting arrested repeatedly — the actor is. And he doesn’t seem to mind; if anything it lends his work credibility and demonstrates that he’s dead serious. He aggressively martyrs himself on the altar of private property in the name of making himself heard, and gradually, the message is getting out. I don’t know how if there’s a good way to quantify difference he makes, but I can appreciate the way the man has decided that he has a mouth, and he must scream.

The documentary itself is both moving and a little less effective than it might've been. It’s edited together in such a way that a very simple message (Buy less — and educate yourself about the things you do buy) becomes too fleshed out, in such a way that it loses a bit of its punchiness. In particular, I thought that there was an obvious message of hope and possibility that was hinted, but largely undeveloped in the film. It's one thing to tell people they need to do something; but if you want to attack the problem at the root, you've got to make some suggestions that address more than just the symptoms of a greater issue.

Reverend Billy seems to feel that the bulk of the problem is simple unawareness. People don’t know where their consumables come from, and they don’t understand the impact of their purchases, so they whip out their wallets with abandon. But simply informing the purchasers is only a fraction of the task. As WWJB demonstrates with intense and deliberate fervor, the vast bulk of marketing is aimed at people who are too young to own cards or draw an income that will support a lifestyle of frivolous expenditure. But there’s an insightful scene wherein three teenaged girls (fairly young ones, perhaps 13 to 15) are asked where their clothes came from. The girls start reading labels, and start asking questions. When the corporate producers of the products can’t answer, the girls go to the internet, and they learn about labor conditions in the third world countries noted on the back of their hipster tee shirts. Then they feel scared (they’re the same age as me!), and guilty (I’ve asked my parents to buy me these things!), and mad (I wouldn’t want to be treated that way!).

Because the great and amazing thing about kids is that many of them* come with an innate and intense desire to know that the world is fair — and where they realize it’s not, they see about trying to make it fair. And this is where Reverend Billy’s message has a big ol’ hole in it. The Church of Stop Shopping has seized a theatrical presentation that speaks to the adults with the pocketbooks, not to the greedy little objects of the marketing blitz.

What I’m trying to say is this: Reverend Billy’s church needs a children’s ministry. It won’t do him any good to attack Disney; this just makes him look like the villain to the primary demanders of Disney products. Instead — or rather, in addition to his present message — he needs a campaign that will explain in easily digestible terms why he objects to Disney as a corporate entity. Kids are smarter than you’d think. They can follow a logic train, even if that train looks like Thomas the Tank Engine, it’s covered in lead, and it was made in Sri Lanka.

So this is my message to the Church of Stop Shopping: invest in some puppets! Set up a separate Kindergarten session before the main course with the whole family in the sanctuary. Prime those little ones with the idea that money goes places and does things apart from (and beyond) bringing home that Disney Princess CD. All children everywhere are already born with the software plug-in that makes them ask, “Why?” over and over again until you want to stuff a pillow in their mouths. Put something important in front of them and make it a little interesting. They’ll ask about it. They’re kids; that’s what they do.


Good heavens, this has run long. At any rate, I suppose I should close on this note: it’s a good documentary, with a good message couched in strange but effective terms. Put the odd back in God, they say — and think twice before pulling out your purse. Only you can bring an end to the shopocalypse!

If you’d like to know more about the message, go visit their website here.



* To clarify and qualify: in my experience, this is particularly true of children to whom life has already proven fair, i.e., middle/upper class youngsters who simply aren’t aware that not all of their peers live comparable comfort. There will always be greedy assholes in both child and adult form; but I honestly believe that if a significant portion of the population had a basic understanding of the impact of their purchases, their spending habits would probably change. Maybe this makes me naive, I don’t know.

[crossposted to/from my website.]
Tags:
 
 
Current Mood: optimistic
 
 
( 29 comments — Post a new comment )
The Indigo Wombat[info]indigowombat on December 10th, 2007 07:14 am (UTC)
Thanks for the excellent review! It looks like an interesting film and one I can learn from, but I suspect I can learn more from your review itself.
cherie priest[info]cmpriest on December 10th, 2007 07:20 am (UTC)
Hay, anytime. I really liked it -- and I do recommend you see it. I left out quite a lot, so if the doc comes through your neck of the woods, go and support 'em.

:)
The Indigo Wombat[info]indigowombat on December 10th, 2007 07:26 am (UTC)
I see that it's playing in Sacramento, so it looks doable to catch the film, if I can find someone to give me a ride and join me for it.

Question: In what way does the reverend seem to "attack Disney"? Second question: How would you recommend that he state the underlying message of hope, for maximum effectiveness? I'm a lot better at "complex" than "simple", myself, so I'm curious to know your thoughts on effective and simple presentation as regards this example.
cherie priest[info]cmpriest on December 10th, 2007 07:29 am (UTC)
Oh, he throws Disney into a pool of large companies who get most of their product produced overseas in sweatshops, under terrible conditions. And Disney has even, in the past, gone to great lengths to stifle union attempts among their foreign workers. It's merely a distinctive and hypocritical example of a company shilling the dreams of children in one country while trodding upon them in another.

As for the message of hope -- I think that better editing and a more obvious focus on educating younger people as a potential solution would have been more effective than throwing it in as a five minute scene, and then moving on to other subjects.
The Indigo Wombat[info]indigowombat on December 10th, 2007 07:31 am (UTC)
Gotcha. I'll chew on that.
The Indigo Wombat[info]indigowombat on December 10th, 2007 07:59 am (UTC)
Upon chewing: I wonder if he thought the message of hope was so obvious that it didn't need to be stated? Just guessing; I haven't seen the film and you have. Either way, your suggestion seems valuable.
cherie priest[info]cmpriest on December 10th, 2007 06:08 pm (UTC)
As quickly as it was glossed over in a 100 minute or so documentary, it could've really stood some emphasis.
The Indigo Wombat[info]indigowombat on December 10th, 2007 06:39 pm (UTC)
Thanks, I appreciate your insights. They apply to my own challenges with presentation, with my stuff, so this is useful for me in figuring out where my own areas of improvement are.

I love the way you write, by the way. :)
cherie priest[info]cmpriest on December 10th, 2007 06:49 pm (UTC)
Why thank you! I appreciate it.

And by way of further chewing ... I should've also mentioned that the bit about the 3 girls is buried somewhere in the middle of the piece; you always want to begin with a punch and end with your emphatic message.
The Indigo Wombat[info]indigowombat on December 10th, 2007 07:01 pm (UTC)
Gotcha. I'll see if I can apply that idea more myself. I'm good with the big ideas and stuff, not so great at figuring out how to present them so others can understand. Your ideas about this film are helping me spot my own problem areas with presentation, and that's a start.
dcart[info]dcart on December 10th, 2007 08:39 pm (UTC)
Back when I used to teach Latin American history to college freshman, one of my favorite units came near the end of the class. The specific facts have changed in the last ten years, but the gist hasn't. One thread that I wove through that class was the extent to which the poverty of the "developing" or "third" world wasn't the result of a lack of hard work or poor planning. It was the result of exploitation by the wealthy countries. In my favorite unit, we looked at what Disney paid its (largely mothers and children) subcontracted workforce in Haiti. Then we went through what it cost to live in Haiti, demonstrated that what they paid (for 50, 60, or 70 hour weeks) didn't cover the cost of living for a family of three or four (let alone larger ones) and then compared that to what the executives at Disney made and how many hundreds or thousands of years it would take a Haitian working 60 hours a week to make what an executive makes in a day, week, or year.
[info]badclams on December 10th, 2007 10:24 am (UTC)

I'd never heard of CoSS but I did encounter a kindred group on the subway earlier this year.

Two large black men stationed themselves on each end of our car and performed a patter that lasted for about 10 minutes.

They questioned each other, in booming voices, about why young people, just young people, no race mention, were constantly buying, coveting, stealing, etc.

This series of questions and answers presented a logical flow of reason that we listeners could follow without feeling like we were being preached at.

The end result was lack of education and nutrition and sleep were the culprits. No one was made to feel guilty (parents) nor told what to do.

At the end they wished us a good night and left.
cherie priest[info]cmpriest on December 10th, 2007 06:09 pm (UTC)
These guys use humor to soften the message, which is -- at its core -- start asking questions about the things you buy. You'll learn a lot, and you might change the world.
[info]9fingers on December 10th, 2007 11:52 am (UTC)
Veeeery interesting, and I think you're right about the young'uns.

I've long been fascinated with the existential alienation that comes with growing up and out of that target demographic. I suspect that a lot of "quarter-life crises" and that disillusioned feeling one begins to have around the 30 year-old mark comes from the fact that -- as far as consumerism goes -- we no longer matter in the scheme of things.

I need to see this doc, I guess.
cherie priest[info]cmpriest on December 10th, 2007 06:10 pm (UTC)
I highly recommend it. And you're right re: 30. That having been said, I spend far less now than I did ten years ago, drat that cursed marketing ...
Ava: Naps![info]awdrey_gore on December 10th, 2007 02:23 pm (UTC)
A very interesting entry. I am definitely going to look into this documentary.

Then I got the WWJB/Staples reference and giggled a bit.
Neo_Prodigy: applause[info]neo_prodigy on December 10th, 2007 03:44 pm (UTC)
Bill Maher touched on a similar point on his New Rules segment on his show.

http://neo-prodigy.livejournal.com/428585.html
contents under pressure / handle with care: lain - contemplative[info]graphxgrrl on December 10th, 2007 03:47 pm (UTC)
I'll have to add that into my Netflix queue.

The unfortunate thing I regularly run into when talking to people about my pet related soapbox issues (environmental responsibility and agricultural economics/responsibility), is that culturally we seem to believe that it's all ultimately someone else's responsibility to fix rather than our own.

Not to mention that in American culture specifically--after the depression and WWII we managed to create a culture that's subconsciously said "We will never have that level of scarcity again." At least in my opinion, that's a lot of what's at the root of some of our excessive materialism--and the overwhelming desire to associate inexpensiveness with value.

There's a cultural paradigm shift that needs to happen, and hopefully will happen--though right now we seem to very much be in the "have our cake and eat it too" stage.
cherie priest[info]cmpriest on December 10th, 2007 06:52 pm (UTC)
Well put, kindly neighbor-woman -- and instigator of my latest 73% recycled handbag ...
gifa[info]gifa on December 10th, 2007 06:10 pm (UTC)
Actually, I've been on this bandwagon for a number of years... Christmas time is my least favorite time of the year for shopping...period. And I'm talking about shopping for things like toilet paper, milk, or the occasional pack of socks or underwear. Heaven forbid I blow out a pair of jeans in December.

It's just tragedy the way the worst is brought out in people by a good deal and a limited quantity of whatever the latest plastic fad happens to be.

Edited at 2007-12-10 06:11 pm (UTC)
cherie priest[info]cmpriest on December 10th, 2007 06:52 pm (UTC)
Indeedy. One of the opening points is that 3/4 of adults view Christmas with more despair and apprehension than anticipation.
howlgirl[info]howlgirl on December 10th, 2007 06:13 pm (UTC)
Reverend Billy was on my local (SF Bay) radio station about 3 days after November 7th oil spill. He pretty graphically pointed out that each and every one of us was responsible for the spill. If we weren't crazy to buy stuff from foreign countries, we wouldn't have ships spilling oil in the ocean.
cherie priest[info]cmpriest on December 10th, 2007 06:51 pm (UTC)
Yeah, he loves his hyperbole. That having been said, much of it (in the documentary) made me think, of all things, about World War Z -- with its underlying message that when the apocalypse comes, each and every one of us will have had a hand in it ... if not through direct action, then through inaction.

[/end ramble]
Stacy Whitman[info]slwhitman on December 11th, 2007 01:24 am (UTC)
I'm not familiar with Rev. Billy, but it does make me think of Buy Nothing Day. More and more, especially every time I move (which lately, has been every year), I look at all the STUFF I've accumulated and think how much I really need to learn to be a minimalist. The two things that take up the most room: my books, and my family history. I don't know how I could ever let those go. Well, the family history research can be digitized, and it's not bought, etc., and the books... don't wanna!

But it makes me wonder what else I might give up to make room for the books, you know? What thing am I needlessly buying and never using to its full capacity (other than all the fresh vegetables I never eat)?
cherie priest[info]cmpriest on December 11th, 2007 01:30 am (UTC)
Oh yeah --no.
Books are totally exempt.

:)
(Anonymous) on December 11th, 2007 09:59 am (UTC)
The Story of Stuff
There's a 20 minute online documentary that also addresses the impact of our over consumption - definitely punchy and accessible enough for my (almost) eleven year old to understand. You might have already seen it - it's at www.storyofstuff.com. I highly recommend it.
(Anonymous) on December 11th, 2007 05:02 pm (UTC)
Owning the past.
My neighbor was showing me his fancy new SUV, complete with every upgrade, option, and bling-bling wheels. He bragged his car payment was more than his rent.

Eventually, I invited him over to say hello to my wife, and he said he couldn't because he was outside waiting for his sister to pop by with -- a cash loan so he could buy some groceries.

He had no clue the car really wasn't his, and when "they" came to repossess it he broke down like someone died.

Creating things and selling them; or trading them, or buying them, or stealing them, or winning them in wars or fights, is a homo-sapien tendency going back thousands and thousands of years.

Wanting and needing stuff, and doing whatever it takes to possess said stuff, isn't bad in and of itself.

The negativity and conflict arise when we want things we don't need and sacrifice too much to get them -- and need things we don't want to make an effort to possess.

We want the bling-bling SUV -- we need the groceries.




David[info]mokole on December 11th, 2007 09:09 pm (UTC)
OMG
I gotta tell you. I just finished "Not Flesh Nor Feathers" and it left me crying....which is kinda embaressing as I was reading at work. What a marvelous book. I'm so glad you wrote it, and I can't wait for more. Just thought you might like to hear a little gushing.
cherie priest[info]cmpriest on December 11th, 2007 11:49 pm (UTC)
Re: OMG
Oh gosh, thank you!
I mean, I'm sorry ...? I don't know. I didn't mean to make anybody cry or anything, but thank you very much for the gushery :)